According to Intent Market Research, the In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market is expected to grow from USD 10.3 billion in 2023-e at a CAGR of 9.0% to touch USD 18.9 billion by 2030. The In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market is dominated by key players such as Thermo Fisher Scientific, SGS, Merck, Eurofins Scientific, Intertek, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Agilent, amongst others.
As per Intent Market Research, the In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market was valued at USD 10.3 billion in 2023-e and will surpass USD 18.9 billion by 2030; growing at a CAGR of 9.0% during 2024 - 2030.
The report focuses on estimating the current market potential in terms of the total addressable market for all the segments, sub-segments, and regions. In the process, all the high-growth and upcoming technologies were identified and analyzed to measure their impact on the current and future market. The report also identifies the key stakeholders, their business gaps, and their purchasing behavior. This information is essential for developing effective marketing strategies and creating products or services that meet the needs of the target market. The report also covers a detailed analysis of the competitive landscape which includes major players, their recent developments, growth strategies, product benchmarking, and manufacturing operations among others. Also, brief insights on start-up ecosystem and emerging companies is also included as part of this report.
Report Objectives:
The report will help you answer some of the most critical questions in the In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market. A few of them are as follows:
Report Scope:
Report Features |
Description |
Market Size (2023-e) |
USD 10.3 billion |
Forecasted Value (2030) |
USD 18.9 billion |
CAGR (2024-2030) |
9.0% |
Base Year for Estimation |
2023-e |
Historic Year |
2022 |
Forecast Period |
2024-2030 |
Report Coverage |
Market Forecast, Market Dynamics, Competitive Landscape, Recent Developments |
Segments Covered |
In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market By Product & Service (Assays, Consumables, Services, Equipment, Software), By Toxicity Endpoints & Test (Genotoxicity, Cytotoxicity, ADME, Dermal Toxicity, Phototoxicity), By Technology (High-throughput, Cell Culture, Toxic Genomics), By End-Use (Consumer Care, Pharmaceutical & Biopharmaceutical, Food) |
Regional Analysis |
North America (US, Canada), Europe (Germany, France, UK, Spain, Italy & Rest of Europe), Asia Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, India, and rest of Asia Pacific), Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, & Rest of Latin America), Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, & Rest of MEA) |
Customization Scope |
Customization for segments, region/country-level will be provided. Moreover, additional customization can be done based on the requirements |
1.Introduction |
1.1.Market Definition |
1.2.Scope of the Study |
1.3.Research Assumptions |
1.4.Study Limitations |
2.Research Methodology |
2.1.Research Approach |
2.1.1.Top-Down Method |
2.1.2.Bottom-Up Method |
2.1.3.Factor Impact Analysis |
2.2.Insights & Data Collection Process |
2.2.1.Secondary Research |
2.2.2.Primary Research |
2.3.Data Mining Process |
2.3.1.Data Analysis |
2.3.2.Data Validation and Revalidation |
2.3.3.Data Triangulation |
3.Executive Summary |
3.1.Major Markets & Segments |
3.2.Highest Growing Regions and Respective Countries |
3.3.Impact of Growth Drivers & Inhibitors |
3.4.Regulatory Overview by Country |
4.In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Product & Service (Market Size & Forecast: USD Billion, 2024 – 2030) |
4.1.Consumables |
4.2.Assays |
4.2.1. Enzyme Toxicity Assays |
4.2.2. Receptor-Binding Assays |
4.2.3. Cell-Based Elisa and Western Blots |
4.2.4. Bacterial Toxicity Assays |
4.2.5.Tissue Culture Assays |
4.2.6.Other Assays |
4.3.Equipment |
4.4.Services |
4.5.Software |
5.In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Toxicity Endpoint & Test (Market Size & Forecast: USD Billion, 2024 – 2030) |
5.1.Genotoxicity |
5.2.ADME |
5.3.Organ Toxicity |
5.4.Cytotoxicity |
5.5.Ocular Toxicity |
5.6.Skin irritation, Corrosion & Sensitization |
5.7.Dermal Toxicity |
5.8.Phototoxicity |
5.9.Other End Point & Tests |
6.In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by End-Use (Market Size & Forecast: USD Billion, 2024 – 2030) |
6.1.Pharmaceutical & Biopharmaceutical Companies |
6.2.Food & Beverage Companies |
6.3.Consumer Care |
6.4.Others |
7.In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Technology (Market Size & Forecast: USD Billion, 2024 – 2030) |
7.1.Toxic Genomics |
7.2.High-throughput |
7.3.Cell Culture |
8.Regional Analysis (Market Size & Forecast: USD Billion, 2024 – 2030) |
8.1.Regional Overview |
8.2.North America |
8.2.1.Regional Trends & Growth Drivers |
8.2.2.Barriers & Challenges |
8.2.3.Opportunities |
8.2.4.Factor Impact Analysis |
8.2.5.Technology Trends |
8.2.6.North America In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Product & Service |
8.2.7.North America In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Toxicity Endpoint & Test |
8.2.8.North America In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Industry |
8.2.9.North America In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Technology |
*Similar segmentation will be provided at each regional level |
8.3.By Country |
8.3.1.US |
8.3.1.1.US In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Product & Service |
8.3.1.2.US In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Toxicity Endpoint & Test |
8.3.1.3.US In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Industry |
8.3.1.4.US In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market, by Technology |
8.3.2.Canada |
*Similar segmentation will be provided at each country level |
8.4.Europe |
8.5.APAC |
8.6.Latin America |
8.7.Middle East & Africa |
9.Competitive Landscape |
9.1.Overview of the Key Players |
9.2.Competitive Ecosystem |
9.2.1.Platform Manufacturers |
9.2.2.Subsystem Manufacturers |
9.2.3.Service Providers |
9.2.4.Software Providers |
9.3.Company Share Analysis |
9.4.Company Benchmarking Matrix |
9.4.1.Strategic Overview |
9.4.2.Product Innovations |
9.5.Start-up Ecosystem |
9.6.Strategic Competitive Insights/ Customer Imperatives |
9.7.ESG Matrix/ Sustainability Matrix |
9.8.Manufacturing Network |
9.8.1.Locations |
9.8.2.Supply Chain and Logistics |
9.8.3.Product Flexibility/Customization |
9.8.4.Digital Transformation and Connectivity |
9.8.5.Environmental and Regulatory Compliance |
9.9.Technology Readiness Level Matrix |
9.10.Technology Maturity Curve |
9.11.Buying Criteria |
10.Company Profiles |
10.1.Merck |
10.1.1.Company Overview |
10.1.2.Company Financials |
10.1.3.Product/Service Portfolio |
10.1.4.Recent Developments |
10.1.5.IMR Analysis |
*Similar information will be provided for other companies |
10.2.Agilent |
10.3.Eurofins Scientific |
10.4.Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings |
10.5.SGS 10.6.Thermo Fisher Scientific 10.7.Bio-Rad 10.8.Lonza 10.9.Intertek 10.10.Catalent |
11.Appendix |
A comprehensive market research approach was employed to gather and analyze data on the In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market. In the process, the analysis was also done to estimate the parent market and relevant adjacencies to major the impact of them on the In Vitro Toxicology Testing Market. The research methodology encompassed both secondary and primary research techniques, ensuring the accuracy and credibility of the findings.
Secondary Research
Secondary research involved a thorough review of pertinent industry reports, journals, articles, and publications. Additionally, annual reports, press releases, and investor presentations of industry players were scrutinized to gain insights into their market positioning and strategies.
Primary Research
Primary research involved conducting in-depth interviews with industry experts, stakeholders, and market participants across the In Vitro Toxicology Testing ecosystem. The primary research objectives included:
Market Size Estimation
A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was utilized to estimate the overall size of the In Vitro Toxicology Testing market. These methods were also employed to estimate the size of various sub-segments within the market. The market size estimation methodology encompassed the following steps:
Data Triangulation
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the market size estimates, data triangulation was implemented. This involved cross-referencing data from various sources, including demand and supply side factors, market trends, and expert opinions. Additionally, top-down and bottom-up approaches were employed to validate the market size estimates.